Regulatory Meeting June 17, 2009
Time
|
Location
|
---|---|
9:30 A.M. Wednesday, June 17, 2009 | Nevada Department of Wildlife Conference Room A 1100 Valley Road Reno, NV |
Minutes, Agenda, & Audio
Settlement Agreements
Settlement Agreements, Air Quality Violations
The Division of Environmental Protection has negotiated 3 Settlement Agreements for Air Pollution Control violations. The SEC is being asked to approve, deny, or modify each agreement for each company.
Regulatory Petitions
Regulation R189-08 - Bureau of Corrective Actions - Leaking Underground Storage Tank and Corrective Action Regulations
This regulatory petition revises the Underground Storage Tank regulations and the Corrective Action regulations that address environmental site cleanups. These regulations are contained in the Nevada Administrative Code at NAC 459.9921 to 459.999 and NAC 445A.226 to 445A.22755 respectively.
The proposed regulations consolidates cleanup requirements for hazardous substance, hazardous waste, or regulated substance released from underground storage tanks and all other release sources. The regulations also make revisions to site assessment procedures to accommodate all types of releases from minor incidents to large sites with long operational histories of potential releases. The regulations better define abatement actions and they refine soil action levels to include consideration of all potential exposure pathways. Detail has been added in the regulations to address requests for exemptions from groundwater corrective actions. The regulations also seek to clarify the transition from Underground Storage Tank compliance requirements, to the initiation of a Leaking Underground Storage Tank cleanup case.
The regulations will not have an immediate or long-term adverse economic impact on the public or the business community. There is no additional cost to the agency for enforcement of the proposed regulation and the regulation does not overlap, duplicate or conflict with any regulations of other government agencies. The regulation does not address fees. (SEC Reference P2008-19)
Documents in Adobe PDF File Format
- October 02, 2008 — LCB Transmittal Letter
- October 23, 2008 — LCB Proposed Draft Regulation
- April 01, 2009 — SEC Form 1
- April 01, 2009 — SEC Form 4
- April 14, 2009 — Workshop Notice
- May 15, 2009 — Workshop Presentation
- May 29, 2009 — SEC Presentation
- May 29, 2009 — Changes to R189-08
- June 08, 2009 — Summary of Public Comments
- June 22, 2009 — Filing Statement Transmittal Letter
- June 22, 2009 — Filing Statment
- June 22, 2009 — Filing Form
- August 25, 2009 — LCB Adopted Regulation
- August 26, 2009 — Cover letter to State Library, filing of regulations
Temporary Regulation T036-09 - Bureau of Air Pollution Control / Air Quality Planning Regulation - Adoption by Reference
The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) is proposing to update NAC 445B.221, “Adoption by reference and applicability of certain provisions of federal law and regulations.” NDEP is proposing to adopt into state regulation sections of the federal New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) rules that have been adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and published in the Federal Register since the NAC was last updated, as well as certain test methods.
These proposed amendments are necessary so that Nevada can request delegation for the implementation of new and revised federal NSPS and NESHAP rules that became effective after March 2008. This update will allow the regulated industry to continue to work with the state as opposed to the EPA. Additionally, adopting the test methods will allow the NDEP to use methods approved by EPA and recognized by the scientific community to measure emissions from sources.
The regulations will not have an immediate or long-term adverse economic impact on the public or the business community. There is no additional cost to the agency for enforcement of the proposed regulation and the regulation does not overlap, duplicate or conflict with any regulations of other government agencies. The regulation does not address fees. (SEC Reference P2009-01)
Documents in Adobe PDF File Format
- May 08, 2009 — LCB Transmittal Letter
- May 08, 2009 — NDEP Proposed Draft Regulation
- May 08, 2009 — SEC Form 1
- May 08, 2009 — SEC Form 4
- May 08, 2009 — Workshop Notice
- May 28, 2009 — Common Language Explanation of T036-09
- July 22, 2009 — LCB Transmittal Letter
- July 22, 2009 — Filing Statement
- July 22, 2009 — Filing Form
Mining Industry Mercury Petition
The Nevada Mining Association (NvMA) has submitted a petition under NAC 445B.886 requesting the State Environmental Commission (SEC) to direct the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) to initiate rulemaking to evaluate the Nevada Mercury Air Emissions Control Program codified under NAC 445B.3611 to NAC 445B.3689.
Specifically, NvMA requests that NDEP be directed to (1) evaluate the implications of EPA's decision to promulgate a federal MACT (Maximum Achievable Control Technology) for the gold mining industry on the Nevada Mercury Control Program (NMCP), including evaluation of the need for a stay of Nevada Maximum Achievable Control Technology (NvMACT) determinations; and (2) report back to the SEC at its next regularly scheduled meeting in October 2009 with recommendations on a path forward.
The basis for the request stems from recent actions taken by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate separate federal mercury emissions control standards that may conflict with NDEP's mercury emissions control program. The EPA's intent is to publish its final rule in September 2010.
- June 08, 2009 — Nevada Mining Association Petition
Note: This petition by the Nevada Mining Association was withdrawan
Discussion
Update by the Division of Environmental Protection on Nevada Wood Preserving Plant concerning odors
- June 16, 2009 — Comment Letter, Glen Miller UNR
- June 17, 2009 — SEC Update: NDEP Investigations & Actions regarding Odor complaints in Silver Springs
Declaratory Order
Petition: Declaratory Order regarding definition of sewage in NAC 445A.107
On January 08, 2009 a non-profit organization named Amargosa Citizens for the Environment's (ACE) petitioned the State Environmental Commission (SEC) for a declaratory order and advisory opinion on four issues as allowed under NAC 445B.888. This regulation allows any member of the public to petition the SEC for a declaratory order or an advisory opinion as to “the applicability of any statutory provision, Commission regulation or decision.”
The SEC considered ACE's petition on February 11, 2009 and issued a “partial decision [Decision 1]” on three of the four issues on March 9, 2009. Petition Issue 3(c), which was deferred at the February 09, 2009 SEC hearing, is now being considered. Petition Issue 3(c) pertains to the definition of sewage as contained in NAC 445A.107. ACE's petition requests the Commission to issue a declaratory order that sewage as defined in NAC 445A.I07 includes dairy feedlots.
- June 04, 2009 — Memoranduom, Nevada AG's Office to NDEP
- June 17, 2009 — Presentation by Anette Rink, Nevada Dept. of Agricultural
- June 17, 2009 — Testimony of Jay Lazarsu, Glorieta Geoscience, Inc.
- June 17, 2009 — Download Audio File for this section [39MB mp3 file]
- June 23, 2009: SEC Decision 2 — Public Petition: Amargosa Citizens for the Environment Submitted Under NRS 233B.120
SEC Policy
Proposed Policy to improve Adjudication of Appeals Filed with the State Environmental Commission (SEC)
To advance disposition of appeals of final decisions, such as enforcement actions and permits issued by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP), SEC counsel and staff are recommending that a Position Statement be required. The Position Statement is proposed in part to augment information now provided on SEC form 3, which is currently used to request an appeal hearing before the SEC by parties initiating appeals (appellants).
The SEC currently has the option pursuant to NAC 445B.8925 to order that briefs be filed before or after an appeal hearing. Formal briefs, however, can be viewed as onerous for individuals who elect not to be represented by counsel during the appeal hearing process. A Position Statement should be not as onerous. A Position Statement would assist all parties prepare their cases for the hearing. Requiring Position Statements under the authority of NAC 445B.8925 is proposed as a policy option to be exercised by the chairman of an appeals panel.
In addition to Form 3 noted above, a Position Statement would at a minimum include (1) a statement of issues to be raised, (2) a list of witnesses and a brief summary of their proposed testimony, (3) the specific legal authority involved in the appeal, and (4) all documents to be introduced as evidence at the appeal hearing. A Position Statement would be filed by the appellants at least 14 days before the scheduled hearing and by the intervening parties and NDEP at least 7 days before the scheduled hearing. The chairman of an appeals panel could modify this schedule. It is further proposed that the concept of the “Position Statement” be incorporated in the next revision to SEC’s Rules of Practice (NAC 445B.875).